The group is noted for its interesting and lengthy discussions. If not carefully watched, they will spend two or three hours and then walk out the door with having taken any definitive action. That is why each agenda item must have a checklist of possible motions - not prohibiting new ones, of course - in order to force a decision.
Vote up or down, but vote and no one gets to "pass" or vote "present." For good or for ill, we are here to make decisions. If you want to say something, say it, but if you want something done, make a motion.
I was recently appointed to a board for a small-in dependent non-profit organization that behaves exactly like the "meeting" you describe.
ReplyDeleteIn my first meeting, I finally asked, "Ok, so what's my deliverable for next time?" Answer: Silence for 7 full seconds. I volunteered to put together a report on the topic, and they all hurredly agreed.
I think the underlying fear is that "forcing" action risks offending someone who either doesn't "feel like" doing whatever they are assigned by virtue of the motion, or has their idea voted down by the group. No one wants to be the bad guy, but people need to realize it is businss, it's not personal (in the immortal words of the Godfather). :)
I think I served on the same board.
ReplyDeleteAmazing!
Michael