Monday, December 03, 2007

E-books versus Paper

Michael at 2Blowhards examines the e-book options and concludes - wisely, I think - that they will never catch on. An excerpt:

Who needs 'em? Books of the paper-and-cardboard sort are miraculously efficient, enjoyable, and affordable content-delivery vehicles. They're unmatchably pleasing in many ways. For one thing, in order to use them you don't have to do any thinking. Interacting with a book is all a matter of reach-and-grab. You get to reserve your mental power for the book's content. With an e-book reader, by comparison, you have to puzzle out how to use the thing, and then you have to keep relearning your lessons. "How do I make the device behave?" keeps breaking in on your experience of the book's content.


Think of the consequences. While being able to store your entire library in one small device certainly sounds appealing, it also means: No passing along your books to family and friends; worries about what will become of your beloved collection should the electronic device it's stored on fail; and -- inevitably -- the nightmare of digital-rights management.

2 comments:

Eclecticity said...

You purist you. D.

Michael Wade said...

Absolutely. I've yet to encounter any piece of technology that rivals the beauty of a fine book.