Precedent had permitted the use of a teddy bear in such circumstances. A defense attorney - David S. Martin - objected, noting the dog is different from a teddy bear and observing, “There was no way for me to cross-examine the dog.”
From the comments:
"Clearly Mr. Martin is not a dog owner."
"It's fair. Maybe Michael Vick should have used a comfort dog @ his trial."
"Because he could cross examine a teddy bear?"
1 comment:
dogssssssssssss
Post a Comment